1-2号Q&A:玩家的利益需要自己来争取

来源:玩家投稿日期:2013年09月02日

 【以下内容来自玩家投稿,具体内容请以国服最新公告为准】

  下面是1号你问我答:

  - when the turret of the IS-7 rotates sideways from the hull and its silhouette overlaps the hull itself, it’s actually possible to shoot the bottom of the turret, if your tank is significantly lower than the IS-7 itself. The bottom of the turret is 20mm thick

  但IS-7炮塔转到侧面与车体投影重合,是可能射击到炮塔底部的,前提是你的车辆比IS-7小很多。-7的底部装甲是20mm厚

  - there are plans for more crew perks – it will happen in WoWp much sooner than in WoT

  计划给于成员更多的附加技能,不过战舰世界要比WOT快很多

  - SerB on linear XP requirement for crew skills in WoWp: “Linear system was implemented as an experiment. It is easier to understand than the exponential one, despite the average effective skill when levelling up being 75 percent (compared to exponential system’s 87 percent). The total XP cost of levelling the crew skills up is the same as in the exponential system”

  关于战机成员技能所需经验:直线系统的实施是作为一项实验,它比指数系统要容易理解的多。尽管升级到75%时有差距,但升级成员的总经验还是相同的。

  - the average battle time in WoT is 7 minutes, for WoWp it’s 3-4 minutes. The WoWp battles are more dynamical and the developers consider these numbers okay

  WOT平均战斗一场的时间是7分钟,战机是3-4分,开发人员认为这些数字都是正常的。

  - SerB states that it is possible to put the T15E2M2 on the Superpershing and it’s also possible to remove it from the regular tank

  - SerB 说可能会把T15E2M2炮放到超潘上面,也可能从普通车上移除这个炮。

  - premium account is now common for WoWp and WoT and it will work for both

  战机和战车的金币帐号可以为两个游戏公用。

  - SerB states that the rewards for player skill improvement are the credits and XP and that’s normal (SS: as in: no extra rewards for steady rating improvement will be offered)

  - SerB指出随着玩家水平的提高,奖励一些银币和经验是再正常不过的方式了。

  - SerB has nothing to do with World of Tanks Assistent (done by a different group)

  - SerB与WOT助手没关系,是另外一帮人在做。

  - SerB states that the current bushes are “standard technology” – if they were all modelled in 3D completely, it would require the players to have much stronger computers

  - SerB 说现在游戏内的“灌木丛”从技术上来说是合乎标准的----如果都用3D模型来完成,那玩家们需要性能更好的电脑

  - shooting a gun actually forces a visibility check outside of regular visibility check cycles (SS: for details on visibility mechanism, check wotwiki)

  开一炮就会被服务器强制一次可见性检查

  - the future of the “180pen Pershing gun” is “in doubt”

  潘兴180穿深的炮未来命运还没确定

  - the 170 pen on T15 gun is historical, it’s calculated according to Soviet methodology of penetration, in which it really is 170 pen

  T15炮170穿深符合历史,是根据苏联的一套穿深计算方式得出来的,真的是170啊…………

  - there is a rumor going around RU forums that because of the gold inflation, all the future new premium tanks will be sold via gift shop. This rumor is false.

  俄论坛谣言四起,由于金币泛滥,所有的金币车都会从礼品店出售,这是骗人的

  - SerB feels “indifferent” towards possible Superpershing penetration buff

  - SerB 觉得超潘增强穿深也没什么了不起啊。

  - as was mentioned before, currently, WoWp average battle time is roughly 4 minutes (which is about half of that of WoT). SerB states that the XP income will be set so that tier 10 can be reached roughly within the same amount of battles as in WoT

  下面是2号你问我答:

  之前提到过,战机场均战斗时间大约是4分钟,是坦克的一半,SerB说升到10级车经验所需的场次也会和坦克一样。

  - Taiwanese TD’s in Chinese tree? “Unfortunately, we haven’t found any yet”

  台—湾TD线在天朝科技树里吗?不好意思,尚未找到任何东西

  - if you unlock Object 140 in 8.8, you will still have it unlocked when Object 430 comes (SS: but you won’t have 430 unlocked automatically as well)

  如果你在8.8点亮了140工程,当430工程出现的时候140仍旧是点亮的状态

  - Q: “Will Maus characteristics be changed? And please answer without trolling.” A:”……….. (here there was supposed to be the trolling, but you asked for no trolling, so…)”

  Q:老鼠的特点会被改变吗?请认真的回答,不要糊弄我。

  A:本来想糊弄你玩的,不过你要求认真回答,这。。。

  - the engine compensation for E50/75 (previously WG firmly said there will be no compensation) was a result of a “little discussion”

  E50/75发动机的补偿是玩家争取来的。

  - SerB on why they buffed already strong tanks: “The strong will become (SS: not stronger, but) more elaborate/advanced, while the weak will recieve additional impulse to become strong”

  对于为什么加强已很够强的车辆:SerB说越强的车操作越复杂,同时性能差的车将会使得你的水平增强

  - SerB states that the T15E2 gun penetration is historical, it was only recalculated according to Soviet standards

  - SerB指出T15E2 炮的穿深符合历史,它只是根据前-苏-联的计算标准重新再算一次而已

  - additionally (regarding the case above), there is no need to point out Hunnicutt results to the developers, they know about his books, SerB states that the method of result recalculation is definitely correct

  另外,关于上面的情况,其实不需要提示Hunnicutt的结论给开发人员,他们知道他写的书,SerB说重新计算之后的结果是绝对正确。

  - T-50-2 was not changed (thrown out) sooner simply because WG didn’t get to do it

  - T-50-2不会随随便便的就改动完事,WG不会这么做。

赛事日历
loading.
14 15 16 17 18 19 20

中国区WGL你是否期待?

关闭