04日Q&A:C系中坦线太弱要加强

来源:多玩坦克世界专区日期:2016年02月17日

 【以下内容来自多玩坦克世界专区,具体内容请以国服最新公告为准】

  03/02/2016 Q&A

  Hello,

  大家嚎~嘟嘟噜~

  have another Slava Q&A for you and first of all I'm glad to see you enjoying this content and that you like Slava, he is indeed a cool guy like I've read you commenting. :)

  This time I not only gathered questions from the comment section but also from emails and even reddit, do keep on sending them in.

  很高兴看到Slava的回答能合观众老爷们的胃口呢,Slava本人确实也非常cool,Rita继续从评论里和电子邮件甚至某新闻网站收集问题并传达给Slava。

  theolice emailed me this. :3

  有人寄如下邮件给Rita:

  For Russian blogs/pages who wrote this:

  "Конкретных решений по улучшению балансировщика сейчас нет, но разработчики рассматривают разные дополнительные варианты, такие как балансировка по огневой мощности, хитпоинтам и да же скилу игрока в какой-то степени, но это все в планах."

  (The text above says that WG plans to balance tanks according to their firepower, hitpoints and player skill)

  - Skill based balance will NEVER happen and Slava has never talked about hp/firepower based balance.

  (大意是毛服那边有传言称WG计划通过火力、HP和成员技能平衡车辆)

  辟谣:不会有任何基于技能的平衡,Slava也从未说起过基于HP/火力的平衡

  Again, don't be afraid of contacting me to clarify things, don't be thick headed please!

  所以欢迎找Rita辟谣……

  Here it is:

  以下是正文啦:

  On the JP100 whine - they plan to nerf it!!111

  Q:他们居然要锉我的白兔!

  -We don’t, reducing alpha dmg is not always a nerf, T-34-85 at tier6 with 100mm gun was horrible, with 85mm it’s the best medium.

  A:不不,降低均伤并不总是意味着削弱,身处6级的T-34-85如果用100炮那实在是糟透了,然而用85炮却使其成为最棒的6级mt

  Q: Is there a chance that we will see the M60A1 introduced into the tech tree for the USA, to help update it a bit to a current standard of other nations with vehicles from the 1960's (T-62A, Leopard 1, AMX-30B, ect.). As well as make the US tier 10 medium competitive with other nations.

  Q:我们有机会在游戏中见到美系M60A1嘛,这样才能对付其他国家那些60年代的顶级中型(T-62A、豹1、30B之类的)嘛,把美系10级MT做的跟其他国家势均力敌好不好嘛?

  -Not A1:)) smth else, I really want to improve US med line.

  A:不会是M60A1,也许是其他某车吧。其实我是很想发展下美系MT线的。

  Q: Is there an option to get the MERDC pattern added for the USA vehicles, or an early variant of it like the MASSTER pattern (AKA 7th Army Camo), if not 1 MERDC pattern per environment.

  Q:有可能会给美系车加入MERDC(机动装备研究与发展中心)的涂装嘛,像MASSTER(也称第七陆军迷彩)这样的早期变种也可以,实在不行每个环境加入一种可以嘛?

  -No idea about that, TBH

  A:说实话没有这方面的想法。

  How about taking away RNG from shell pen and damage? It would make this game competitively sound to a point and will be esports viable, as of now there is too much RNG for anyone to call themselves "professional players" of WoT.

  Q:取消掉25%的穿深和伤害浮动区间好不好?这样可以使游戏的竞技性更健全并加入电竞,现在的的随机性太大了,只要脸白每个人都能成为“职业选手”。

  -I’ll look into that.

  A:我会调查的。

  What happened to the other supertest tanks like the Steyr WT and the Rhm. Skorpion?

  (国服请无视这条)Q:仍躺在超测中的斯太尔WT和天蝎会怎么样呢?

  -We’ll use them in 2016 at some point.

  A:我们会在2016年的某时用上它们。

  Personally, I don't get why everyone is chomping at the bit to nerf the T110E5. Why not keep the new machine gun turret as-is? It still has other weak spots to be exploited. From what I can gather, getting that armor buff now allows it to act as a real heavy on the battlefield.

  Q:我自己不知道为何每个人都迫不及待地想砍E5,为啥不保留这个新机枪塔呢?E5又不是没有其他弱点。据我所知,正是机枪塔的装甲buff让E5真正成为战场上的男人。

  -E5 will not be kept as it is, no chance to avoid nerf – it is simply the best heavy AND the best US T10 medium (it has more fire power and survivability than an M48A1 while comparable on mobility) defacto at the moment.That might be not the armor nerf tho, mobility nerf is another option, or some other option

  A:E5不能再这么嚣张下去了,砍在所难免——事实上现在的E5既是最棒的重型坦克也是美国最好的中型坦克(火力和生存强于M48A1而机动持平)。有可能不会砍装甲,砍机动是另一个选项,或者可能砍一些别的。

  Could you ask what will become of super high alpha tanks like jaegeroo, waffen and death star? I hope they get slightly nerfed in a way...

  Q:能问问那些单发超高的坦克如白兔白云183会怎样嘛?我希望能稍稍削弱下。

  -JP100 will be fine, less alpha, more gun comfort, the tank concept is sound and I don’t want to nerf it. WT100 will be replaced. 183mm guns will be reworked with new HESH.

  A:白兔还好啦,均伤低点,主炮舒适度提升点,坦克的概念是合理的,我并不想砍它。白云会替换啦。183的主炮会随着新HESH的到来而重做。

  ALSO chinese tds???? Type 89! HEHEHE (imo chinese tanks need a buff)

  Q:天朝TD呢?89式!呵呵呵(直说了吧天朝车太弱了需要加强)

  -Yes, medium line and some of the HTs and LTs need help.

  A:是啊,中坦线和部分轻重型都需要加强。

  "The two answers regarding map rotation andcorridors"

  -We need to remove shitty maps, including low tier maps, Mittengard!

  -We will change maps, starting with removal of corridor ones.

  In my opinion, this wouldn't leave much maps untouched in the process.

  Q:你们曾说的“解决地图循环重复和走廊的两个回答”一是移除那些烂图,包括低级图像密特朗,二是改地图,从移除走廊图开始,但你们就不觉得这样就没剩下几张图了吗?

  -Yes, too many bad maps, I don’t want to keep them.

  A:是啊,烂图太多了,我一张也不想留着。

  Q: Wouldn't it be better to redo maps first, with all the new insights you have been given over the past year, instead of taking the blunt approach like mentioned in answer two?

  (接上条)Q:先重做地图,用你们在过去几年得到的见解去改图而不会像上述回答二中直接移除的生硬方法不是更好吗?

  -Takes too long compared to “by fire be purged”. Seriously, Stalingrad is soo bad it’s easier and cheaper to make a new one.

  A:比起直接重做,改地图花的时间太长了。说真的,斯大林格勒这图太烂了,直接做个新图又快又省经费。   "How about just decreasing the damage of prem. ammo by 50% ."

  Q:“砍掉金币弹50%的伤害如何?”

  -No.Rebalancing prem ammo is okay tho. Things like 420 pen HEAT will have to go away.

  A:不。金币弹是要砍,420穿吃枣药丸。

  (接上条)

  Q's: Can Slava explain on this? It is a bit contradicting to read 'no' followed by 're-balancing prem ammo is okay'. What did he have in mind, what direction?

  In which direction should we, us players, be thinking in regards to your vision on how this is could be rebalanced?ó

  Q:你们是怎么看待修改方向的,我们玩家又该如何看待?

  -Reduction of dmg of premium ammo? I don’t like the idea of ruining premium ammo, that’s what these “let’s nerf gold dmg by 30-50%” questions are – some people ask us to take away gold ammo one way or another. Gold ammo for silver is important part of game economy.So the idea is that premium ammo is a better ammo. Does better always mean more penetration?No, it doesn’t.

  A:降低金币弹伤害?我不喜欢这种毁掉金币弹的主意,“砍掉金币弹30%-50%的伤害吧”也是——有人要求我们通过某种方式移除银币弹。但银换金也是游戏经济平衡的重要部分。所以金币弹是更好的弹种。更好就意味着更高穿深么?并不是。

  Options:

  选择很多:

  More pen or more dmg or faster speed or more crits or…there are many options.

  For example, Su100Y already has different gold ammo – more dmg one. For some tanks we can go that way, why not?

  更高穿深、或者更高伤害、或者更高初速、再或者更高毁伤几率……有很多的选择。

  举栗,SU-100Y就有不同种类的金币弹——更高伤害。对于有些坦克我们就可以用这种方式,不是么?

  I want to suggest 2things

  Q:我想建议两件事:

  1.durring the European community contributer thing (Cyprus meeting), the question of testing tanks came out, but no one from wg or YouTube knew how to implement it. I came up with the idea of lending tanks. I want their opinion on this. I got alot of good feedback from players on the thread.

  1、在塞浦路斯会议期间,测试坦克的问题显露出来,但WG和Youtube上没人知道如何加入坦克。我有个租借坦克的想法,我希望你们能考虑下,我在论坛上收集到了很多玩家的正面反馈。

  -Lending? Not sure what you mean. I know how to test tanks. :)

  We need a public test realm which is almost always on and we can test new tanks or features there, the way WoW does that.

  Slava:租借?不太确定你们的意思(像私服一样搞个限时车呵呵)我知道怎么测试坦克。

  我们需要公测区域,而这已经在搞了,我们在此测试新坦克和新特效,WoW也是这么搞的。

  2.splittng the conqueror into fv215b and the chieftain, same way the t-54 splits up.

  2、让征服者能同时研发FV215b和酋长两个10级车吧,就像T-54那样。

  -FV215b is a tank we had to invent back in the days, Chieftain is real.

  Slava:FV215b是我们在过去发明的坦克,而酋长是真实的。

  How bad did the Chieftain armor have to be for them to hold off putting it in?

  Just put it in. It's not like this will be the first time they put an underpowered tank in game... and they can always buff it.

  Q:酋长的装甲是有多糟,让你们举棋不定不加入游戏?就加入吧,这又不是你们第一次加入弱鸡车了...而且你们总可以buff嘛。

  -It’s bad enough, T-54 or is-3 can pen turret with regular ammo, not just cupola. You simply cannot tank enemy shells in tier X with this tank. We have enough of glass cannon tanks in the game, why add another?

  A:真的很差,T-54和IS-3的银币弹都能击穿炮塔,而且不仅仅是车长塔位置。酋长基本不能抵御10级车的炮火,游戏中这种黄金脆皮鸡已经够多了,你们还要啃吗?

  Wait, did they just say camo paint benefits smaller tanks more??? I thought it was flat based on class - HT 2%, MT and LT 3%, and TDs the highest. How does this actually work? What exactly does the comment mean?

  Q:等等,你们是有说过涂装在小坦克上收益更多嘛?我一直以为是基于坦克类型——HT 2%,MT LT 3%,TD最高,这到底是怎么工作的,这是啥意思?

  -Percentage is relative value, that’s how. So yes, let’s say you have 100 camo with LT and 3% of said camo is 3. And you have 10 camo in Maus, same 3% is 0.3.

  A:百分比是相对值啦,就是这样,好比说你100伪装值的轻坦,3%对应的就是3,而10伪装值的老鼠,3%只有0.3

  WG is planning to take away my female crew with crew redesign?!!111

  Q:阴谋啊,WG是要通过车组重制来拐走我的女成员?!

  -No, it’s a mission reward, I like female crews :)

  A:不,女成员可是任务奖励,我也喜欢女成员:)

  RG: For those who asked about the Sentinel, it will be premium

  顺便,哨兵AC1也是金币车

  以上信息译自StatusReport源地址:

  http://ritastatusreport.blogspot.nl/2016/02/03022016-q.html

赛事日历
loading.
14 15 16 17 18 19 20

中国区WGL你是否期待?

关闭